Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Dharmas are the repeated impressions of objects previousl... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The Yogācāra dream argument fails to establish the non-existence of external objects

    Dharmas are the repeated impressions of objects previously experienced, analogous to memory

    Consciousness & MindPerception
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    PerceptionConsciousness & Mind

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Skepticism
    1 linked

    Related

    Dharmas are based on intrinsically real conventional objectsDream-consciousness and similar states have dharmas as their objects (ālambana)The Yogācāra dream argument fails to establish the non-existence of external obj...

    Similar

    Ordinary memory-images of perceiving an event (e.g. recalling the sigh...80%Dream objects arise in dependence upon the transformation of residual ...79%The present experience is not an event insofar as it is repeatable thr...77%Repeated experience of paired impressions creates a habit of thought s...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: twotruths-india
    View source passageHide passage
    The arguments that affirm the conventional reality of the external objects are the same arguments that Bhāvavevika employed to criticise the Yogācāra arguments rejecting the reality of external objects. Bhāvavevika’s [MadhHK] 5.15 points out Yogācāra’s arguments are contradicted by perception (pratyakṣa), tradition (āgama) and commonse sense (lokaprasiddha), since they all prove the correctness of the cogniton of material form ([MadhHK] 5.15 Dbu ma dza 20b and Tarkajvālā 5.15 Dbu ma dza 204ab).

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective