Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Disparities in wealth and power reduce the likelihood tha... — Carmelics
    Home/Justice & Punishment
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Global agreements and coordinated action on public health are unlikely to fairly represent and protect the interests of people in poorer nations.

    Disparities in wealth and power reduce the likelihood that international agreements will fairly represent less powerful parties.

    Democracy & GovernanceJustice & Punishment
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Justice & PunishmentDemocracy & Governance

    Connections

    1 topic

    Bioethics1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Justice & Punishment
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Global agreements and coordinated action on public health are unlikely to fairly...Nations differ greatly in wealth and other forms of power in today's global orde...

    Similar

    Collective coordination under conditions of unequal power produces out...73%Satisfied powers benefit from the existing international arrangement a...72%Values such as peace, social justice, and international order are not ...71%Satisfying unsatisfied powers requires the dominant powers to make mea...70%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: publichealth-ethics
    View source passageHide passage
    Perhaps most foundationally, the self-interest reason for nations to engage globally in public health cannot be separated from questions of global structural injustice in international relations more broadly. Many threats to public health, including the threats from climate change, cannot be effectively addressed absent collective global action. However, in today’s global order in which nations differ greatly in wealth and other forms of power, the likelihood that agreements and coordinated acti

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective