Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Distinguishing causation from causal explanation is itsel... — Carmelics
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The claim that the separatist about grounding explanation incurs no new debt is undermined by the fact that the quasi-causal model is not the only model of metaphysical explanation.

    Distinguishing causation from causal explanation is itself a substantive philosophical commitment, not a neutral starting point.

    CausationTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    CausationTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    The analogy between grounding explanation and causal explanation assumes a quasi...The claim that the separatist about grounding explanation incurs no new debt is ...The quasi-causal model of metaphysical explanation is not the only available mod...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    Separatists about causal explanation must explain how causation and ca...86%Metaphysical explanation is like causal explanation even if grounding ...82%Contrastivism about causation is a distinct position from contrastivis...82%This is not a reductive analysis of causation but a clarification of w...82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: metaphysical-explanation
    View source passageHide passage
    Following Raven (2015), who applies the terminology to grounding and grounding explanations in particular, approaches to this fundamental question might be classified with regard to whether they take a “unionist” or “separatist” line. Standardly, unionism about grounding and grounding explanation is the thesis that they are one: to be grounded just is to be metaphysically explained in a distinctive way (e.g., Dasgupta 2014; Jenkins 2013; Litland 2013, 2017; Raven 2012; Rosen 2010; Thompson 2016)

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective