Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Divisibility is of the essence of extension. — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Atoms cannot serve as the ultimate constituents that ground the reality of bodies.

    Divisibility is of the essence of extension.

    Modality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & Possibility

    Connections

    1 topic

    Personal Identity4 linked

    Related

    Atoms are extended beings.Atoms cannot serve as the ultimate constituents that ground the reality of bodie...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Even physically indivisible atoms would still be aggregates of distinct parts, a...
    For a thing to ground the reality of bodies, it must be a real being with true u...
    +2 moreShow less
    There is no principled explanation for why bodies of a definite smallness could ...Therefore atoms remain aggregates and lack true unity.

    Similar

    Therefore, F ≠ G implies the extension of F ≠ the extension of G.91%EXP and NEXP both properly extend P.85%EXP and NEXP both properly extend P84%A mode of extension cannot exist without an extended substance.82%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: leibniz-mind
    View source passageHide passage
    According to Leibniz, bodies (qua material) are aggregates, and an aggregate, of course, is not a substance on account of its lack of unity. The claim in the above passage is that whatever being or reality an aggregate has derives from the being and reality of its constituents. Thus, Leibniz thinks that if a body is to have any reality at all, if it is to be more than a mere “phenomenon, lacking all reality as would a coherent dream,” then it must ultimately be composed of things which are real

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective