Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Even physically indivisible atoms would still be aggregat... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Personal Identity
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Atoms cannot serve as the ultimate constituents that ground the reality of bodies.

    Even physically indivisible atoms would still be aggregates of distinct parts, and an invincible attachment of parts does not overcome the diversity of those parts.

    Modality & PossibilityPersonal Identity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Personal IdentityModality & Possibility

    Related

    Atoms are extended beings.Atoms cannot serve as the ultimate constituents that ground the reality of bodie...Divisibility is of the essence of extension.For a thing to ground the reality of bodies, it must be a real being with true u...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Personal Identity
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    +2 moreShow less
    There is no principled explanation for why bodies of a definite smallness could ...Therefore atoms remain aggregates and lack true unity.

    Similar

    Indivisible atoms in combination cannot be proved to exist as indivisi...84%Therefore atoms remain aggregates and lack true unity.82%Extended objects must necessarily be composed of parts, with atoms as ...79%If atoms could share a common locus, any composite mass would be no la...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: leibniz-mind
    View source passageHide passage
    According to Leibniz, bodies (qua material) are aggregates, and an aggregate, of course, is not a substance on account of its lack of unity. The claim in the above passage is that whatever being or reality an aggregate has derives from the being and reality of its constituents. Thus, Leibniz thinks that if a body is to have any reality at all, if it is to be more than a mere “phenomenon, lacking all reality as would a coherent dream,” then it must ultimately be composed of things which are real

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective