Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Doug is not obligated to have such an irrational belief — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Doug is not obligated at 2 pm to eat a healthy meal at 6 pm

    Doug is not obligated to have such an irrational belief

    Justice & PunishmentMoral Responsibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityJustice & Punishment

    Notable Defenders

    PortmorecontemporaryPortmore 2011: 168

    Connections

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Moral Responsibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    1 topic

    Skepticism2 linked

    Related

    An agent is only obligated to perform an action if there exists a combination of...Doug is not obligated at 2 pm to eat a healthy meal at 6 pmThe only way Doug can ensure at 2 pm that he will eat a healthy meal at 6 pm is ...There is no combination of intentions and permissible attitudes Doug can have at...

    Similar

    Morality is not irrational for any of those to whom it applies to foll...84%One is never irrational in doing one's moral duty79%It can be rational to inculcate theistic belief even if theistic belie...79%Therefore, bringing about such a belief is rational in those circumsta...78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: actualism-possibilism-ethics
    View source passageHide passage
    Part (2) of the above definition states that an agent must have a capacity (or an ability) to have certain attitudes and intentions. This allows one to sidestep the difficulties that have been posed for the conditional analysis of abilities (cf. Portmore 2011: 168). Part (3) states that the agent’s attitudes must be permissible. To illustrate, suppose that the only way in which Doug can ensure at 2 pm that he will eat a healthy meal rather than pizza at 6 pm is by having the irrational belief th

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective