Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Portmore — Carmelics
    Thinkers/Portmore
    P

    Portmore

    contemporaryAnalytic Ethics

    Douglas W. Portmore is an American moral philosopher at Arizona State University, known for his work on consequentialism, moral obligations, and the relationship between rationality and morality. He has made significant contributions to debates about commonsense consequentialism and the nature of moral reasons.

    Notable Achievements

    1

    Developed Commonsense Consequentialism, reconciling consequentialism with agent-relative moral intuitions

    2

    Advanced influential arguments on the relationship between moral obligations and rational requirements

    3

    Published 'Commonsense Consequentialism: Wherein Morality Meets Rationality' (Oxford, 2011)

    4

    Contributed to debates on supererogation, moral demandingness, and deontic logic

    5

    Extensive work on teleological conceptions of practical reasons and moral theory

    Positions & Arguments(5)

    Moral Responsibility

    claim

    Doug is not obligated at 2 pm to eat a healthy meal at 6 pm

    premise

    An agent is only obligated to perform an action if there exists a combination of intentions and permissible attitudes the agent can have such that having them would result in performing the action

    premise

    The only way Doug can ensure at 2 pm that he will eat a healthy meal at 6 pm is by having the irrational belief that his life depends upon eating a healthy meal at 6 pm

    At a Glance

    Ideas

    5

    Topics

    3

    Era

    contemporary

    Tradition

    Analytic Ethics

    Topic Influence

    Moral Responsibility5
    Justice & Punishment3
    Skepticism2

    Related Thinkers

    premise

    Doug is not obligated to have such an irrational belief

    premise

    There is no combination of intentions and permissible attitudes Doug can have at 2 pm that would result in him eating a healthy meal at 6 pm

    Justice & Punishment

    claim

    Doug is not obligated at 2 pm to eat a healthy meal at 6 pm

    premise

    An agent is only obligated to perform an action if there exists a combination of intentions and permissible attitudes the agent can have such that having them would result in performing the action

    premise

    Doug is not obligated to have such an irrational belief

    Skepticism

    premise

    The only way Doug can ensure at 2 pm that he will eat a healthy meal at 6 pm is by having the irrational belief that his life depends upon eating a healthy meal at 6 pm

    premise

    There is no combination of intentions and permissible attitudes Doug can have at 2 pm that would result in him eating a healthy meal at 6 pm

    Immanuel Kant
    3 shared
    David Hume3 shared
    G.W.F. Hegel3 shared
    Thomas Hobbes3 shared
    Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz3 shared
    Alvin Goldman3 shared
    Cohen3 shared
    Frank Jackson3 shared

    Dive Deeper

    Explore Moral Responsibility→See Justice & Punishment→