Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Drift is not a directional force — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Drift is not a directional force

    CausationModality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Eliminating heterozygosity is not sufficient to show that drift is directional
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If two alleles exist at a locus at equal frequencies, we cannot predict which allele will go to fixation, only that one will
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A claim that one of two alleles will fix is analogous to saying a force acts on an object without specifying direction, which is not a directional claim
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityCausation

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Truth & Knowledge2 linked

    Related

    A claim that one of two alleles will fix is analogous to saying a force acts on ...Drift is not a separate process from selectionEliminating heterozygosity is not sufficient to show that drift is directionalIf two alleles exist at a locus at equal frequencies, we cannot predict which al...

    Similar

    Drift is a force81%Drift is not a defensible force in the causalmechanistic sense77%A more elaborated account of what a force is (drawing on Bigelow et al...76%Drift is a force, though less force-like than selection, mutation, and...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: genetic-drift
    View source passageHide passage
    Brandon (2006), however, argues that “eliminating heterozygosity” is not sufficient to show that drift is directional, given that (as Stephens would readily acknowledge) if there were two alleles at a locus, beginning at equal frequencies, we could not predict which of the two alleles would go to fixation, only that one of them would; Brandon likens this to saying that “a 20-Newton force is acting on object A”, (2006: 325), which, he seems to imply, is not a directional claim. Moreover, he argue
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit