Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Edward Nelson's Internal Set Theory enriches the basic la... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Internal Set Theory resolves the asymmetry between standard and non-standard reals by enriching the basic language of mathematics to distinguish between standard and non-standard real numbers and between internal and external sets.

    Edward Nelson's Internal Set Theory enriches the basic language of mathematics to allow distinction between standard and non-standard real numbers.

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility2 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Philosophy of Language
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Internal Set Theory resolves the asymmetry between standard and non-standard rea...Internal sets behave the same as standard sets of standard reals, including that...The set of all infinitesimals is an external set that cannot be defined within t...

    Similar

    Internal Set Theory resolves the asymmetry between standard and non-st...91%Wittgenstein appears to offer an essentialist argument that real numbe...77%Non-standard analysis provides simpler and more intuitive proofs of ma...77%Non-standard real analysis can prove results in real analysis that wer...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: infinity
    View source passageHide passage
    For results stated in a first-order logical language, the hyperreals and the standard reals satisfy the transfer principle. But for results about sets, they behave differently. Every bounded set of standard reals has a least upper bound. However, for instance, the set of infinitesimal hyperreals is bounded (every member is less than .00001, among other bounds), but there is no least upper bound (no infinitesimal is an upper bound for all of the others, and every finitely large upper bound can be

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective