Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Internal Set Theory resolves the asymmetry between standa... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Internal Set Theory resolves the asymmetry between standard and non-standard reals by enriching the basic language of mathematics to distinguish between standard and non-standard real numbers and between internal and external sets.

    Truth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Edward Nelson's Internal Set Theory enriches the basic language of mathematics to allow distinction between standard and non-standard real numbers.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Internal sets behave the same as standard sets of standard reals, including that bounded internal sets always have a least upper bound.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The set of all infinitesimals is an external set that cannot be defined within the language and thus does not necessarily have a least upper bound.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.IST's 'standardness' predicate is not definable within ZFC, making it a metalinguistic annotation rather than a genuine enrichment of mathematical ontology.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Nelson's transfer principle preserves first-order truths but cannot eliminate the metatheoretic asymmetry, since 'standard' remains undefinable by any internal formula.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A distinction that cannot be expressed within the object language resolves no asymmetry but merely relocates it to the metalanguage, leaving the foundational problem intact.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Hrbacek's critique demonstrates that IST's axiomatic constraints force every set to be either fully standard or non-standard in ways that conflict with classical analysis's continuity assumptions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the resolution of an asymmetry requires restricting which set-theoretic operations preserve standardness, the resulting framework imposes new asymmetries rather than eliminating the original one.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Philosophy of LanguageTruth & Knowledge

    Key Terms

    Enriching the basic language(what Internal Set Theory does to mathematics)
    Adding new words, symbols, or concepts to the vocabulary we use in mathematics so we can talk about and work with more things.
    Internal Set Theory(the main subject of the statement)
    A mathematical framework created by Abraham Robinson that treats infinite and infinitesimal (incredibly tiny) numbers as legitimate objects you can actually work with, rather than just useful shortcuts.
    Non-standard reals(contrasted with standard reals)
    Numbers that exist in extended number systems but aren't part of the usual real numbers; they include infinitesimals (numbers infinitely close to zero) and infinite numbers that standard math doesn't normally use.
    Standard reals(contrasted with non-standard reals)
    The ordinary real numbers you learn about in regular math class—numbers like 1, 2.5, π, and √2 that can be located precisely on a number line.
    asymmetry(Modal logic frame semantics)
    A frame property expressible in hybrid logic by the formula c→□¬◇c, meaning if world x accesses world y, then y does not access x.
    external sets(Internal Set Theory; examples include the set of all infinitesimals and the set of all standard real numbers)
    Sets that cannot be defined within the basic language of Internal Set Theory and do not necessarily satisfy properties like the least upper bound property.
    infinitesimals(Peirce's philosophy of mathematics and foundations of calculus)
    Quantities that constitute the 'glue' causing points on a continuous line to lose their individual identity, thereby grounding the concept of a true continuum
    internal sets(Internal Set Theory)
    Sets that can be defined in the basic language of Internal Set Theory; they behave the same as standard sets of standard reals, including the property that bounded internal sets always have a least upper bound.

    Connections

    1 topic

    Modality & Possibility2 linked

    Related

    A distinction that cannot be expressed within the object language resolves no as...Edward Nelson's Internal Set Theory enriches the basic language of mathematics t...Hrbacek's critique demonstrates that IST's axiomatic constraints force every set...

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: infinity
    View source passageHide passage
    For results stated in a first-order logical language, the hyperreals and the standard reals satisfy the transfer principle. But for results about sets, they behave differently. Every bounded set of standard reals has a least upper bound. However, for instance, the set of infinitesimal hyperreals is bounded (every member is less than .00001, among other bounds), but there is no least upper bound (no infinitesimal is an upper bound for all of the others, and every finitely large upper bound can be
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    IST's 'standardness' predicate is not definable within ZFC, making it a metaling...
    +4 moreShow less
    If the resolution of an asymmetry requires restricting which set-theoretic opera...Internal sets behave the same as standard sets of standard reals, including that...Nelson's transfer principle preserves first-order truths but cannot eliminate th...The set of all infinitesimals is an external set that cannot be defined within t...

    Similar

    Edward Nelson's Internal Set Theory enriches the basic language of mat...91%Non-standard real analysis can prove results in real analysis that wer...80%Non-standard analysis provides simpler and more intuitive proofs of ma...79%Robinson's non-standard analysis is based on infinitesimals and their ...76%
    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit