Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Either Pierre's doxastic position cannot be as described in §2.6 or London and Londres are different cities (or we must punt).
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Kripke's puzzle shows that Pierre's doxastic position generates contradiction even under substitution-resistant belief contexts, without requiring distinct objects.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The puzzle's force derives from rationality norms on belief, not from metaphysical claims about identity, so Church's modal argument conflates epistemic and ontological levels.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
A Fregean solution—that 'London' and 'Londres' express distinct senses—dissolves the contradiction without positing distinct cities or denying Pierre's described beliefs.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Russellian accounts of propositional attitudes, as developed by Salmon and Soames, permit an agent to believe and disbelieve a single singular proposition under different guises without contradiction.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If there is no genuine doxastic contradiction in Pierre's position on the Salmon-Soames view, the disjunction 'bad doxastic state OR distinct cities' is a false dichotomy.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Church's argument implies that if Pierre's doxastic position is as described, then London and Londres are distinct objects.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The standard account of identity holds.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.