Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Emotions must be cognitive evaluations of some kind rather than mere feelings
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Infants and non-human animals exhibit clearly emotional responses—fear, grief, joy—without the conceptual apparatus required for cognitive evaluation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Any theory that cannot account for pre-cognitive and cross-species emotional phenomena fails as a general theory of emotion.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
William James's somatic theory and Damasio's somatic marker hypothesis show that felt bodily changes are constitutive of emotion, not mere epiphenomena.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Bodily feelings can themselves carry intentional content without involving cognitive evaluation, as Prinz argues via 'embodied appraisals'.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If feelings can be directed at objects through their causal history and functional role, cognitivism loses its explanatory monopoly on intentionality.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Emotions are object-directed and endowed with intentionality
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
In order to account for the intentionality of emotions, emotions must be cognitive evaluations rather than feelings
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42