Epistocratic or deliberative procedural constraints on democratic power, as argued by Estlund and Christiano, may better protect the equal standing of marginalized groups than unconstrained democratic institutions.
?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.
Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.
Estlund and Christiano(as referenced philosophers)
David Estlund and Tom Christiano are contemporary political philosophers who have written about how democracy should work and what makes it fair and legitimate.
Marginalized groups(as used in social and political philosophy)
Communities or populations that are pushed to the edges of society and have less power and influence in decisions, often due to discrimination or historical disadvantage.
Unconstrained democratic institutions(as used in political philosophy)
Government systems based on majority rule without special rules, limits, or safeguards that might protect minorities or require careful deliberation before decisions.