Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Even if Simmons' objection against Rawlsian public reason... — Carmelics
    Home/Democracy & Governance
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Public reason accounts face the further challenge of showing that public justification is required for political legitimacy.

    Even if Simmons' objection against Rawlsian public reason accounts is refuted, it remains an open question whether public justification is a necessary condition for political legitimacy.

    Democracy & GovernanceSocial Contract
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Democracy & GovernanceSocial Contract

    Key Terms

    Rawlsian
    "Rawlsian" refers to the ideas of philosopher John Rawls, who developed an influential theory of what makes a society fair and just. His key idea is that a fair society should be organized as if people didn't know what position they'd occupy in it—meaning the rules should benefit everyone, especially the least advantaged, since anyone could end up in that situation. Rawls fundamentally changed how people think about justice and equality in modern democracies.
    Simmons(as a philosopher whose objection is being discussed)
    A contemporary political philosopher (A. John Simmons) known for challenging mainstream theories about why governments have the right to rule over us.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Democracy & Governance
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    necessary condition(Counterfactual analysis of causation; Mackie 1965, 1974)
    A condition C is necessary for event E if E would not have occurred in the absence of C
    objection(as a scientific critique)
    A logical problem or reason why something might not work or be true. Einstein found what he thought was a flaw in Weyl's theory.
    political legitimacy(Central to disputes about whether justice obligations are confined to the nation state or extend globally)
    The property by which a political institution's coercive power is justified and generates obligations
    public justification(Component of Estlund's epistemic proceduralism)
    The requirement that the justification of political procedures must be acceptable to all reasonable citizens in order to respect their freedom and equality
    public reason(Restrictive conception of public reason liberalism, as advanced by Bonotti and Barnhill 2019)
    A reason is public if and only if it is compatible with the motivational set of each idealized person.

    Related

    Enoch (2015) raises this challenge against public reason approaches.Public reason accounts face the further challenge of showing that public justifi...

    Similar

    Public reason accounts face the further challenge of showing that publ...90%Political legitimacy should be understood as what creates political au...76%Enoch (2015) raises this challenge against public reason approaches.75%The account of legitimate authority as a justification right is not un...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: legitimacy
    View source passageHide passage
    Simmons (2001) criticizes Rawls’ approach for mistakenly blurring the distinction between justifying the state and political legitimacy (see also section 2.3.). A Rawlsian could reply, however, that the problem of legitimacy centrally involves the justification of coercion and that legitimacy should thus be understood as what creates—rather than merely justifies—political authority. The following thought supports this claim. Rawls—in Political Liberalism—explicitly focuses on the democratic cont

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective