Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Exaggerating the perfection of the cause beyond what the ... — Carmelics
    Home/Natural Theology
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Appeals to exaggeration and flattery in descriptions of the deity are illegitimate substitutes for argument and reasoning

    Exaggerating the perfection of the cause beyond what the effect warrants relies on flattery rather than evidence

    Against an attribute of GodNatural Theology
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Natural TheologyAgainst an attribute of God

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Natural Theology
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Skepticism
    1 linked

    Related

    Appeals to exaggeration and flattery in descriptions of the deity are illegitima...Flattery and exaggeration cannot supply the defects of argument and reasoningValid inference requires proportioning the cause to the observed effect

    Similar

    An effect cannot have more perfection than its cause, because a cause ...83%A faulty and imperfect effect does not warrant inferring a perfect cau...80%No effect can have any perfection that is not also in its cause80%No effect can have any perfection that was not already in its cause78%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: hume-religion
    View source passageHide passage
    Philo goes on to suggest that, for all we know, this world “is very faulty and imperfect, compared to a superior standard”. Given this, we may also conjecture that this world was created by “some infant Deity, who afterwards abandoned it, ashamed of his lame performance” or it is “the production of old age and dotage in some superannuated Deity”, and so on (D, 5.12/169). The general point being made is that in the absence of clear evidence of perfection in this world we must “proportion the caus

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective