Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    External objects are perceived with intersubjective agree... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Perception
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The empirical universe is an objective but less-than-real appearance (māyā), not fully real nor fully unreal.

    External objects are perceived with intersubjective agreement, so they are not individual subjective illusions and are independent of mind.

    PerceptionTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    PerceptionTruth & Knowledge

    Connections

    2 topics

    Modality & Possibility4 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Perception
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Natural Theology
    1 linked

    Related

    A third ontological category is needed: an appearance that is objective yet less...Objects are unreal in that they are transient and dependent, yet are not non-exi...The empirical universe is an objective but less-than-real appearance (māyā), not...The universe cannot be both fully real and fully unreal simultaneously without c...

    Similar

    Physical objects do not exist independently of minds but consist solel...84%Perceptual experiences are not intersubjectively accessible in the sam...81%Direct perception does not provide access to objects outside the mind.81%Ordinary perception typically requires the perceived thing to be an ob...81%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: shankara
    View source passageHide passage
    Still, the empirical universe presents an ontological difficulty for Śaṅkara because he is an epistemic realist. He accepts that external objects are not individual subjective illusions because we perceive these effects with intersubjective agreement. The world is thus independent of mind and not wholly unreal. One may therefore argue that he contradicts himself or falls into an excluded middle (see Fost 1998). The universe either exists or does not exist, is real or unreal, and cannot be both s

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective