Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that External objects are present to the mind only by means of internal mental appearances that serve as proxies for them
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Perception is a direct causal relation between mind and world, not mediated by inner proxies (Gibson's ecological realism, Putnam's direct realism).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Positing mental intermediaries generates an explanatory regress: proxies themselves require perception, undermining the account's foundations.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
The content of perceptual experience is partly constituted by its external objects, not internal surrogates (McDowell's disjunctivism, Snowdon 1981).
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If veridical and hallucinatory experiences share only a highest common factor, the special epistemic force of genuine perception is lost, not preserved.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Perceptual appearances are entirely mental and internal rather than relational
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Some cognitive access to external objects is nonetheless achieved through perception
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.