Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Faith in the Incarnation means believing in something hig... — Carmelics
    Home/Religious Experience
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→Faith in the Incarnation requires suspension of reason

    Faith in the Incarnation means believing in something higher than reason

    Religious ExperienceTrinity
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Religious ExperienceTrinity

    Connections

    1 topic

    Skepticism1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Religious Experience
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Believing in something higher than reason requires suspending reason rather than...Faith in the Incarnation requires suspension of reason

    Similar

    Believing in something higher than reason requires suspending reason r...78%Faith can be identified with holding a belief that God exists, is bene...78%Faith is (plausibly) a form of trust.77%'Divine' can mean 'relating to a god' without being a god.76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: kierkegaard
    View source passageHide passage
    Christian dogma, according to Kierkegaard, embodies paradoxes which are offensive to reason. The central paradox is the assertion that the eternal, infinite, transcendent God simultaneously became incarnated as a temporal, finite, human being (Jesus). There are two possible attitudes we can adopt to this assertion, viz. we can have faith, or we can take offense. What we cannot do, according to Kierkegaard, is believe by virtue of reason. If we choose faith we must suspend our reason in order to

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective