Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Faith in the Incarnation requires suspension of reason
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
Aquinas argues faith and reason operate in complementary domains, with reason preparing the intellect for revealed truths beyond its scope.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
The Incarnation being 'above reason' does not entail contradiction with reason, only transcendence of it, making suspension unnecessary.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Hegel contends that the Incarnation is the rational self-externalization of Absolute Spirit, making it comprehensible through speculative reason.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If the Incarnation has an internal rational structure, then faith directed at it engages reason rather than suspending it.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
Faith in the Incarnation means believing in something higher than reason
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Believing in something higher than reason requires suspending reason rather than relying on it
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.