Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Feinberg's offense principle demonstrates that serious, p... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Power can be rightfully exercised over a member of a civilized community only to prevent harm to others.

    Feinberg's offense principle demonstrates that serious, profound offense to unwilling witnesses constitutes a harm sufficient to justify legal prohibition.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Unwilling exposure to deeply offensive content causes genuine psychological distress comparable to other recognized harms like noise pollution.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Liberal societies already restrict speech causing serious harm; offense to captive audiences deserves equal consideration as competing interests.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.People have a right to use public spaces without forced confrontation to content violating their core values and dignity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Offense is subjective and varies by person; legal standards based on offense risk suppressing unpopular but socially valuable speech.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Psychological discomfort differs fundamentally from tangible harm; expanding harm to include offense dangerously broadens state power.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Citizens in pluralistic societies must tolerate exposure to offensive views; shielding people from offense undermines democratic deliberation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Rights & Liberty1 linkedJustice & Punishment1 linked

    Related

    Citizens in pluralistic societies must tolerate exposure to offensive views; shi...Liberal societies already restrict speech causing serious harm; offense to capti...Offense is subjective and varies by person; legal standards based on offense ris...People have a right to use public spaces without forced confrontation to content...
    +3 moreShow less
    Power can be rightfully exercised over a member of a civilized community only to...Psychological discomfort differs fundamentally from tangible harm; expanding har...Unwilling exposure to deeply offensive content causes genuine psychological dist...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit