Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Fodor's computational representationalism identifies beli... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→There may be no fact of the matter about whether a subject really believes a given proposition P

    Fodor's computational representationalism identifies beliefs with syntactically structured states whose causal powers are intrinsic, not interpretation-dependent.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Syntax is intrinsic to physical systems; a brain state's syntactic structure exists independently of external interpretation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Causal explanation in cognitive science succeeds by referencing formal properties of mental states, not their semantic content.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.This view avoids the combination problem: semantic content cannot causally efficacious if it depends on interpreter conventions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Neural activity has no privileged 'syntactic structure' independent of how we model or describe it; structure requires interpretation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If syntax alone drives causation, we cannot explain why beliefs about tigers cause different behaviors than beliefs about rabbits.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The theory divorces mental states from their adaptive function, leaving unexplained why minds represent content at all.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Causal explanation in cognitive science succeeds by referencing formal propertie...If syntax alone drives causation, we cannot explain why beliefs about tigers cau...Neural activity has no privileged 'syntactic structure' independent of how we mo...Syntax is intrinsic to physical systems; a brain state's syntactic structure exi...
    +3 moreShow less
    The theory divorces mental states from their adaptive function, leaving unexplai...There may be no fact of the matter about whether a subject really believes a giv...This view avoids the combination problem: semantic content cannot causally effic...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit