Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    For the inferential cognition to be true, the considerati... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Causation
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The truth of the 'parāmarśa' is the causal factor (guṇa) responsible for the truth of the inferential cognition

    For the inferential cognition to be true, the consideration (parāmarśa) must be true

    CausationTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    CausationTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    The 'guṇa' is the condition responsible for the truth of a cognitionThe parāmarśa is true when the locus in fact possesses a sign that is pervaded b...The truth of the 'parāmarśa' is the causal factor (guṇa) responsible for the tru...

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Causation
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    The 'parāmarśa' (consideration) is the operative condition (vyāpāra) o...91%The operative condition of inferential cognition is an awareness that ...84%The truth of the 'parāmarśa' is the causal factor (guṇa) responsible f...81%A pramāṇa is an invariable correlate of true cognitions80%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: early-modern-india
    View source passageHide passage
    I will discuss mainly the definition of the ‘pervasion’ relation. First, however, a brief note on how the causal model of knowledge is applied to inference. The ‘special’ instrumental cause (karaṇa) of an inferential cognition is said to be the inferrer’s knowledge of the relevant pervasion relation. The ‘operative condition’ (vyāpāra) is said to be an awareness that the locus of inference (p) possesses such an inferential sign (h) as is pervaded by the property inferred (s). This is, in effect,

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective