Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    G.N. Lewis' particular structural account is not the only... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→The structural conception of chemical bonding does not require electron pairs as the bonding entities

    G.N. Lewis' particular structural account is not the only possible structural account of bonding

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Bonds on the structural conception must be sub-molecular and directional, but ne...The structural conception of chemical bonding does not require electron pairs as...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    The structural account only requires that some portion of the total el...80%The Lewis-like structural conception of bonding treats bonds as compos...78%There is likely a reasonably tidy scientific account of how atoms bond...77%The structural conception of bonding is compatible with electron deloc...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: chemistry
    View source passageHide passage
    Defenders of the structural conception of bonding respond to these challenges by noting that G.N. Lewis’ particular structural account isn’t the only possible one. While bonds on the structural conception must be sub-molecular and directional, they need not be electron pairs. Responding specifically to the challenge from quantum ontology, they argue that bonds should be individuated by the atomic centers they link, not by the electrons. Insofar as electrons participate physically in the bond, th

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective