Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    There is likely a reasonably tidy scientific account of h... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Van Inwagen's argument against the well-definability of cohesion may be resisted by fixing paradigm cases of non-living complexes and identifying cohesion with whatever bonding holds in those cases.

    There is likely a reasonably tidy scientific account of how atoms bond in such cases.

    CausationModality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityCausation

    Connections

    2 topics

    Philosophy of Language3 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    Truth & Knowledge
    1 linked

    Related

    A similar strategy applied to non-living composites would define the required co...Putnam's natural kinds strategy fixes paradigm cases and identifies the kind by ...Van Inwagen's argument against the well-definability of cohesion may be resisted...

    Similar

    G.N. Lewis' particular structural account is not the only possible str...77%Quantum mechanics does not predict pairs of electrons to be localized ...77%Quantum mechanical descriptions of bonds cannot depend on the identity...75%Covalent bonds are located between specific atomic centers rather than...75%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: substance
    View source passageHide passage
    Van Inwagen’s main argument is that necessary and sufficient (particularly sufficient) conditions cannot be given for the kind of cohesion of parts that is supposed to bind atoms into complexes. None of the standard candidates—contact, fastening, adhesion, fusion, nor any acceptable disjunction of them—will suffice. They all have counterexamples. So the notion cannot be well defined. The arguments are subtle and interesting. The question might be raised whether van Inwagen gives sufficient consi

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective