Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that General structures must be models of the Comprehension Schema to guarantee completeness

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Frames semantics allows universes to be arbitrary subsets of standard universes
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Arbitrary subsets are not guaranteed to satisfy Comprehension
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Without Comprehension, the universes lack the sets and relations needed for second-order reasoning
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.