Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    General structures must be models of the Comprehension Sc... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    General structures must be models of the Comprehension Schema to guarantee completeness

    Modality & Possibility
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    0 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Frames semantics allows universes to be arbitrary subsets of standard universes
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Arbitrary subsets are not guaranteed to satisfy Comprehension
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Without Comprehension, the universes lack the sets and relations needed for second-order reasoning
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityTruth & Knowledge

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Related

    Arbitrary subsets are not guaranteed to satisfy ComprehensionFrames semantics allows universes to be arbitrary subsets of standard universesTherefore universes must additionally be closed under definabilityWithout Comprehension, the universes lack the sets and relations needed for seco...

    Similar

    A simple counting argument demonstrates that no structure can satisfy ...78%¬G_F is equivalent to ∃x Prf_F(x, ⌈G_F⌉), so models satisfying ¬G_F mu...77%Γ implies C only if C is satisfied by every model in MΓ rather than ev...77%The canonical model B_K (or B_S4) can be used to build the general str...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: logic-many-sorted
    View source passageHide passage
    Namely, the set of validities of \(\XL\) is recursively enumerable. Therefore, \(\XL\) is complete in an abstract sense. Remark: So, we learn that a calculus for \(\XL\) is a natural demand, but we also learn that in MSL we can simulate such a calculus and then we could use a theorem prover for MSL. 5 Level Two: the Main Theorem When the \(\XL\) logic under scrutiny has a concept of logical consequence, we may try to prove the Main theorem; that is, that consequence in \(\XL\) (\(\Pi \models _
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (1 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit