Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Gettier cases show that reliably-produced true belief still fails to constitute knowledge, undermining reliability as a necessary condition.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Gettier cases involve defeated justification, not failed reliability—reliable processes don't guarantee justified belief under defeaters.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Reliabilism can accommodate Gettier cases by refining what counts as the relevant reliable process, avoiding the need for wholesale rejection.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Showing reliability isn't sufficient doesn't entail it isn't necessary; knowledge might require both reliability and additional conditions.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.In Gettier cases, belief-formation mechanisms work reliably yet agents lack knowledge, proving reliability alone is insufficient.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A necessary condition must hold in all cases where the definiendum holds. Since knowledge exists without reliability, it's not necessary.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The Smith-Jones case shows reliably-formed true belief about 'the person with 10 coins' fails as knowledge due to epistemic luck.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42