Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that God did not abstain from working before creating heaven and earth, because there was no time before God's creation.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.The concept of 'before creation' may be coherent even without physical time, if God exists in a logical or metaphysical order that precedes temporal order.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Leibniz and Clarke's debate establishes that relational time and absolute time are distinct, allowing meaningful reference to pre-creation states without presupposing physical duration.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If logical priority constitutes a meaningful 'before,' then God's non-action prior to creation remains a coherent object of inquiry regardless of the absence of physical time.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Boethius's model of divine eternity as 'nunc stans' entails that God encompasses all moments simultaneously, meaning divine agency is not temporally indexed to creation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If God's eternal nature exists outside temporal sequence altogether, then the claim that 'no time existed before creation' does not resolve the question of why God acted when God did rather than otherwise.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.The Principle of Sufficient Reason, as Leibniz invoked it against Newton, demands an explanation for the specific moment of creation that mere temporal eliminativism cannot supply.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.God is the cause of all times.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.No time existed that was not brought into being by God.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If no time existed before God made heaven and earth, then one cannot say God abstained from working during that period.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.