Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    God must be an agent (have a free will in the libertarian... — Carmelics
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    God must be an agent (have a free will in the libertarian sense)

    Divine Attributes
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Intelligence without liberty is really no intelligence at all with respect to any power, excellence, or perfection
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.God is intelligent
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.A perfectly rational being necessarily acts according to sufficient reason, making its will determined by reasons rather than libertarian-free.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Leibniz demonstrated that God always chooses the best possible world, meaning divine volition follows necessarily from perfect rationality.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.If God's choices are necessitated by perfect goodness and reason, divine agency is compatible with determinism rather than requiring libertarian freedom.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Spinoza established that attributing libertarian free will to God anthropomorphizes the divine and undermines God's status as a necessary being.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.A truly necessary being acts from the necessity of its own nature, not from contingent choices between alternatives that libertarian freedom requires.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Divine AttributesFree Will & Foreknowledge

    Related

    A perfectly rational being necessarily acts according to sufficient reason, maki...A truly necessary being acts from the necessity of its own nature, not from cont...God is intelligentIf God's choices are necessitated by perfect goodness and reason, divine agency ...
    +3 moreShow less
    Intelligence without liberty is really no intelligence at all with respect to an...Leibniz demonstrated that God always chooses the best possible world, meaning di...Spinoza established that attributing libertarian free will to God anthropomorphi...

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: clarke
    View source passageHide passage
    If successful, Clarke’s argument a priori establishes all the metaphysical attributes of God (independence, eternality, immutability, infinitude, omnipresence) by examining the nature of necessity and positing the contingency of the world. To reach the personal and moral attributes of God, it is necessary to draw upon further features of the world and argue a posteriori (D 38, W 2.543). Clarke attempted a variety of arguments to establish that God is an agent (that is, that God is not only intel
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit