Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    God's conservation of a quantity of motion is compatible ... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Finite human minds are not the source of motion in bodies.

    God's conservation of a quantity of motion is compatible with finite minds initiating motion if God's decree itself constitutes a standing permission for such transfers, as Leibniz's vis viva framework suggests.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.God's decree can establish general laws that permit finite agents to transfer motion without requiring constant divine intervention in each act.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Leibniz's vis viva (living force) framework preserves God's ultimate conservation while allowing genuine agent causation within divinely permitted bounds.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Standing permissions avoid occasionalism's problem of denying finite causation while maintaining divine sovereignty over the total system.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.If God's decree merely 'permits' motion transfers, it remains unclear how this differs meaningfully from God actually causing each transfer event.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Leibniz's vis viva framework faces independent objections about energy conservation that undermine its reliability as a model for divine permission.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A 'standing permission' concept requires explaining how permissive decrees bind God's will without being causal acts themselves—a potential logical gap.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Key Terms

    Decree(as used in theology)
    An official command or decision, especially God's will or commands that establish how the universe operates.
    God's conservation(as used in metaphysics and theology)
    The philosophical idea that God continuously maintains and sustains everything that exists in the universe, moment by moment, rather than creating it once and leaving it alone.
    Leibniz
    Leibniz is a German philosopher and mathematician from the 1600s-1700s who developed calculus (a powerful math tool for measuring change and areas) independently around the same time as Isaac Newton. He's famous for creating much of the notation we still use in mathematics today and for arguing that everything in the universe follows logical principles. His ideas profoundly influenced modern science, mathematics, and philosophy, making him one of history's most important thinkers.
    Standing permission(as used in ethics and theology)
    An ongoing, general allowance for something to happen, rather than a one-time approval—like a blanket rule that permits certain actions.
    finite minds(One of three candidate causes of bodily movement in La Forge's argument)
    Non-divine mental substances such as human minds, considered as a potential source of causal activity in bodies
    framework(Carnap's philosophy of language and logic)
    A structured system of rules or language that must be in place for rational discourse to be possible.
    quantity of motion(Descartes's proposed measure of force)
    The product of velocity and mass (e.g., 1 m/s × 4 lbs = 4 units)
    vis viva(Leibnizian mechanics; the quantity Leibniz argues is conserved)
    A measure of force calculated as mass times the square of speed (mv2).

    Connections

    2 topics

    Natural Theology1 linkedDivine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    A 'standing permission' concept requires explaining how permissive decrees bind ...Finite human minds are not the source of motion in bodies.

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit
    God's decree can establish general laws that permit finite agents to transfer mo...
    If God's decree merely 'permits' motion transfers, it remains unclear how this d...
    +3 moreShow less
    Leibniz's vis viva (living force) framework preserves God's ultimate conservatio...Leibniz's vis viva framework faces independent objections about energy conservat...Standing permissions avoid occasionalism's problem of denying finite causation w...