Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that God would have a good reason for creating a world with individuals who possess libertarian free will.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
2 perspectives
Reason for 1 of 2
?
1.
An omnipotent God could create beings with genuinely robust free will who are nonetheless reliably disposed toward good, as Plantinga's own 'transworld depravity' concept is not a logical necessity.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If no possible free creature is transworld depraved, God could actualize a world with libertarian free will and no moral evil, undermining the necessity of evil as a cost of freedom.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reason for 2 of 2
?
1.
Libertarian free will requires the ability to do otherwise, but J.M. Fischer's work shows moral responsibility is compatible with determinism, making libertarian free will not uniquely valuable.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
If compatibilist freedom suffices for genuine moral responsibility and authentic virtue, the purported axiological superiority of libertarian free will—and thus God's reason to prefer it—is unestablished.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
The world is a better place if it contains individuals who possess libertarian free will, rather than individuals who are free only in a compatibilist sense.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.