Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    God's nature remains an inexplicable mystery beyond the s... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Divine Attributes
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    God's nature remains an inexplicable mystery beyond the scope of human understanding.

    Divine Attributes
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.All analogies between God and human minds (or other natural processes) are weak and remote.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Weak and remote analogies are insufficient to establish substantive knowledge of God's nature.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.No available analogy yields a determinate characterization of the first cause of the universe.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Natural theology, from Aquinas to Swinburne, demonstrates that God's attributes (omnipotence, omniscience) can be derived through rigorous a posteriori inference.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If causal reasoning can establish that a first cause exists, the same reasoning yields determinate structural properties of that cause proportionate to its effects.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.A conclusion that God is wholly unknowable is self-undermining, since it presupposes sufficient knowledge of God's nature to declare it inaccessible to human cognition.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Kant's postulates of practical reason establish rational grounds for attributing determinate moral attributes to God independent of analogical empirical inference.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If moral experience grounds knowledge of divine attributes without relying on weak natural analogy, the claim that God's nature is inexplicable is too broad and must be restricted to metaphysical rather than moral characterization.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Divine AttributesSkepticism

    Connections

    1 topic

    Natural Theology3 linked

    Related

    A conclusion that God is wholly unknowable is self-undermining, since it presupp...All analogies between God and human minds (or other natural processes) are weak ...If causal reasoning can establish that a first cause exists, the same reasoning ...If moral experience grounds knowledge of divine attributes without relying on we...
    +4 moreShow less
    Kant's postulates of practical reason establish rational grounds for attributing...Natural theology, from Aquinas to Swinburne, demonstrates that God's attributes ...No available analogy yields a determinate characterization of the first cause of...Weak and remote analogies are insufficient to establish substantive knowledge of...

    Similar

    God's nature remains altogether mysterious and incomprehensible from t...96%The truly pious acknowledge that God's nature exceeds human comprehens...77%Weak and remote analogies are insufficient to establish substantive kn...76%Satan's devilish nature is no less central to Satan's nature than huma...76%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: hume-religion
    View source passageHide passage
    On the interpretation provided, it is clear that Hume’s critique of the argument from design is deep and radical. There are, however, several passages in the final Part of the Dialogues (XII) that suggest that Philo (Hume) reverses or at least moderates his position — making some significant concessions to Cleanthes’s position. The most important evidence of this appears in a passage at the beginning of Part XII where Philo says that no one can be so stupid as to reject the view that there are s
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit