Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    No available analogy yields a determinate characterizatio... — Carmelics
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→God's nature remains an inexplicable mystery beyond the scope of human understanding.

    No available analogy yields a determinate characterization of the first cause of the universe.

    Natural TheologySkepticism
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismNatural Theology

    Connections

    1 topic

    Divine Attributes1 linked

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    All analogies between God and human minds (or other natural processes) are weak ...God's nature remains an inexplicable mystery beyond the scope of human understan...Weak and remote analogies are insufficient to establish substantive knowledge of...

    Similar

    The analogy between the first cause of the universe and human mind or ...86%No scientific explanation can provide a causal account of the very beg...80%The Kalaam cosmological argument employs reasoning about origins, self...77%Aquinas's identification of the first cause with the God of religion g...77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: hume-religion
    View source passageHide passage
    On the interpretation provided, it is clear that Hume’s critique of the argument from design is deep and radical. There are, however, several passages in the final Part of the Dialogues (XII) that suggest that Philo (Hume) reverses or at least moderates his position — making some significant concessions to Cleanthes’s position. The most important evidence of this appears in a passage at the beginning of Part XII where Philo says that no one can be so stupid as to reject the view that there are s

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective