Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Good evidence for a hypothesis requires considering all r... — Carmelics
    Home/Skepticism
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→We cannot conclude that natural selection played an important role in the evolution of a trait merely because we have a plausible adaptive hypothesis for that trait.

    Good evidence for a hypothesis requires considering all relevant competing hypotheses, not just adaptive ones.

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    SkepticismTruth & Knowledge

    Related

    Many different evolutionary trajectories can lead to the same outcome.Subtle differences in evolutionary history may lead to different evolutionary ou...We cannot conclude that natural selection played an important role in the evolut...We lack good epistemic access to evolutionary history.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Skepticism
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.

    Similar

    When competing hypotheses employ different auxiliary hypotheses, evide...87%Unconceived hypotheses may explain the evidence better than any hypoth...83%Competing hypotheses may rely on different auxiliary hypotheses to acc...80%A rule requiring hypotheses to be exclusive (cannot both be true) and ...79%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: adaptationism
    View source passageHide passage
    The debate over adaptationism contains claims and counterclaims about what hypotheses should be included in an analysis of the adaptiveness of a trait. This is crucial because assessments of evidentiary support depend on what hypotheses we consider (see Sober 1990, Earman 1992). We must consider all the relevant hypotheses in order to provide good evidence for a hypothesis (Stanford 2006, Forber 2010). One common pluralist complaint is that adaptationists neglect this standard of evidence. Such

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective