Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Goodman's necessity claim is conceptually problematic bec... — Carmelics
    Home/Aesthetics
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Goodman's necessity claim is conceptually problematic because it makes 'brilliant performance of a work' incoherent for any performance containing wrong notes.

    AestheticsPhilosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.On Goodman's view, a performance with wrong notes fails to be an instance of the work.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If a performance is not an instance of a work, it cannot meaningfully be called a brilliant performance of that work.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Goodman's own formulation describes such performances as 'brilliant' while also disqualifying them as instances.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    AestheticsPhilosophy of Language

    Related

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Goodman's own formulation describes such performances as 'brilliant' while also ...If a performance is not an instance of a work, it cannot meaningfully be called ...On Goodman's view, a performance with wrong notes fails to be an instance of the...

    Similar

    On Goodman's view, a performance with wrong notes fails to be an insta...81%Goodman's own formulation describes such performances as 'brilliant' w...77%Goodman's theory does not need to deny that an incorrect performance o...77%Sapaṇ's abstract logical criticism of the Self-sufficient Remedy doctr...74%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: goodman-aesthetics
    View source passageHide passage
    Within the ontology of music, the claim for which the score fully, and solely, individuates the work has received the most attention. Separating ontological from evaluative claims, as seen above, Goodman could not state his stance on the matter more clearly: “the most miserable performance without actual mistakes” counts as an instance of a work, “while the most brilliant performance with one wrong note does not” (1976, 186). Of the two claims, that compliance with a score is necessary for a per
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit