Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Goodman's necessity claim is conceptually problematic because it makes 'brilliant performance of a work' incoherent for any performance containing wrong notes.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.On Goodman's view, a performance with wrong notes fails to be an instance of the work.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If a performance is not an instance of a work, it cannot meaningfully be called a brilliant performance of that work.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Goodman's own formulation describes such performances as 'brilliant' while also disqualifying them as instances.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Aesthetics
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.