Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Grounding philosophical inquiry in historically contingen... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Philosophers speculating about women ought to take into account the obstacles to women's opportunities for subjecthood and choice created by those who constructed an oppressive situation for women.

    Grounding philosophical inquiry in historically contingent oppressive structures risks relativizing moral truth to particular social arrangements rather than discovering objective norms.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Historically contingent(as used in metaphysics and social philosophy)
    Something that exists only because of specific facts about history; it could have been completely different if history had gone another way.
    Moral truth(what Street's argument questions)
    The idea that some moral statements are objectively true or false—not just opinions—the way 'the Earth orbits the Sun' is objectively true.
    Objective norms(as used in ethics and metaethics)
    Standards for how people should behave that exist independently of anyone's personal beliefs or preferences—rules that apply to everyone, not just some groups.
    Oppressive structures(as used in social and political philosophy)
    Systems or institutions (like government, education, or the economy) that are organized in ways that unfairly harm certain groups of people.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Relativizing(as the method applied to semantics)
    Making something dependent on or changeable based on different backgrounds or contexts, rather than treating it as absolute or universal.
    grounding(Drawn from contemporary metaphysics; proposed as potentially applicable to understanding the foundations of legality.)
    A metaphysical relation in which some entities or facts are more foundational than others, providing a hierarchical structure of the world.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Rights & Liberty1 linkedMoral Responsibility1 linked

    Related

    Philosophers speculating about women ought to take into account the obstacles to...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective