Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Philosophers speculating about women ought to take into a... — Carmelics
    Home/Moral Responsibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Philosophers speculating about women ought to take into account the obstacles to women's opportunities for subjecthood and choice created by those who constructed an oppressive situation for women.

    Moral ResponsibilityRights & Liberty
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    2 reasons against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.A woman's position is deeply ambiguous, navigating a human condition defined in its relation with the Other.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.To philosophize about women, it is indispensable to understand the economic and social structure in which women aim to be authentic or ethical.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Understanding women's situation necessitates an existential point of view, taking into account her total situation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    2 perspectives
    Reason against 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Universal moral principles derived from reason apply to all rational agents regardless of their situated social conditions, per Kantian deontology.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Grounding philosophical inquiry in historically contingent oppressive structures risks relativizing moral truth to particular social arrangements rather than discovering objective norms.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Rawls's veil of ignorance methodology deliberately abstracts from situated identities precisely to prevent parochial social facts from distorting foundational moral reasoning.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason against 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Nozick's libertarian framework holds that individuals possess inviolable rights that precede and constrain collective social arrangements, making structural oppression a political rather than philosophical-methodological problem.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Requiring philosophers to account for oppressive structures presupposes contested contestable claims about systemic causation that are themselves subjects of ongoing empirical and normative dispute.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Topics

    Moral ResponsibilityRights & Liberty

    Key Terms

    Obstacles to opportunities(as used in discussions of justice and equality)
    Barriers or difficulties that prevent people from being able to access the same choices and possibilities that others have—like discrimination that limits jobs, education, or rights.
    Oppressive situation(as used in political philosophy and social theory)
    A system or set of conditions where certain people are unfairly prevented from having power, freedom, or opportunities because of their identity (like gender, race, or class).
    Subjecthood(as used in philosophy of identity and ethics)
    The state of being a person whose own thoughts, feelings, and experiences matter—someone whose perspective and choices are recognized and valued by others.

    Notable Defenders

    Alison BaileycontemporaryBailey 2009
    Alison JaggarcontemporaryJaggar 1974, 283
    Alison JaggarcontemporaryJaggar 1974
    Amy BaehrcontemporaryBaehr 2004
    Anita Superson

    Connections

    3 topics

    Consciousness & Mind2 linkedPersonal Identity2 linkedVirtue Ethics1 linked

    Related

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: feminism-ethics
    View source passageHide passage
    Beauvoir first self-identified as a feminist in 1972 (Schwarzer 1984, 32), and consistently refused the label of a philosopher despite having taught courses in philosophy (Card 2003, 9). Yet beginning in the 1950s, both her Ethics of Ambiguity ([1947] 1976) and The Second Sex ([1949] 2010) were widely read and quickly appreciated as important to feminist ethics (Card 2003, 1). As works of existentialist morality, they emphasized that we are not all simply subjects and individual choosers but als
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    contemporary
    Superson 2012
    Anita SupersoncontemporarySuperson 1993
    Anita SupersoncontemporarySuperson 2012
    Ann CuddcontemporaryCudd 2005
    Ann GarrycontemporaryGarry 2017
    Anna CarastathiscontemporaryCarastathis 2014, 304
    Annette BaiercontemporaryBaier 1994
    Audre LordecontemporaryLorde 1990
    Barbara HoustoncontemporaryHouston 1990
    Bonnie SteinbockcontemporarySteinbock 1994
    Carol GilligancontemporaryGilligan 1982, In a Different Voice: Psychological Theory and Women's Development
    Carol Gilligancontemporary
    Carol HaycontemporaryHay 2013
    Carol J. AdamscontemporaryAdams 1990
    Catharine MacKinnoncontemporaryMacKinnon 2006
    Chris CuomocontemporaryCuomo 2007
    Christie HartleycontemporaryHartley and Watson 2010
    Claudia CardcontemporaryCard 1990; Card 1996
    Diana Tietjens MeyerscontemporaryMeyers 2016
    Elena Flores Ruízcontemporary2014, 199
    Elizabeth AndersoncontemporaryAnderson 1999
    Elizabeth SpelmancontemporarySpelman 1991
    Eloy LaBradacontemporaryLaBrada 2016
    Emma GoldmancontemporaryGoldman 2012
    Eva Feder KittaycontemporaryKittay 1999
    Helga VardencontemporaryVarden 2012
    Henry RichardsoncontemporaryRichardson 2007
    Jean HamptoncontemporaryHampton 1993; Hampton 1998
    Joan TrontocontemporaryTronto 1995
    Josephine DonovancontemporaryDonovan 1990
    Judith ButlercontemporaryButler 1990; Butler 1993
    Judith Jarvis ThomsoncontemporaryThomson 1971
    Julia DrivercontemporaryDriver 2005
    Julia SeranocontemporarySerano 2007
    Karen J. WarrencontemporaryWarren 2000
    Kathryn GinescontemporaryGines 2014
    Kathryn Paxton GeorgecontemporaryGeorge 1994
    Kimberlé CrenshawcontemporaryCrenshaw 1989; Crenshaw 1991
    Kimberlé CrenshawcontemporaryCrenshaw 1991
    Kristie DotsoncontemporaryDotson 2014
    Lawrence KohlbergcontemporaryReferenced in Gilligan 1982, 30
    Linda BellcontemporaryBell 1993
    Linda RadzikcontemporaryRadzik 2005
    Lisa TessmancontemporaryTessman 2005
    Lisa TessmancontemporaryTessman 2015
    Lisa TessmancontemporaryTessman 2015
    Lori Jo MarsocontemporaryMarso 2010
    Lori WatsoncontemporaryHartley and Watson 2010
    Luce IrigaraycontemporaryIrigaray 1985
    Margaret Urban WalkercontemporaryWalker 1998; Walker 2003
    Margaret Urban WalkercontemporaryWalker 1998; Walker 2003
    Mari MikkolacontemporaryMikkola 2016
    Marilyn FriedmancontemporaryFriedman 1994
    Martha NussbaumcontemporaryNussbaum 1999
    María LugonescontemporaryLugones 1987; Lugones 2014
    Michael SlotecontemporarySlote 2007
    Michele Moody-AdamscontemporaryMoody-Adams 1991
    Nadya VasilyevacontemporaryAyala and Vasilyeva 2015
    Nel Noddingscontemporary
    Nel NoddingscontemporaryNoddings 1984
    Nel NoddingscontemporaryNoddings 1984
    Patricia Hill CollinscontemporaryCollins 1990
    Patricia Hill CollinscontemporaryCollins 1990
    Rachel McKinnoncontemporaryMcKinnon 2014
    Robin Dilloncontemporary2017b, 574
    Robin JamescontemporaryJames 2013, 752
    Rosemarie Tongcontemporary1993, 160
    Rosemarie TongcontemporaryTong 1993
    Ruth SamplecontemporarySample 2002
    Sally HaslangercontemporaryHaslanger 2012
    Samantha BrennancontemporaryBrennan 2010
    Sandra BartkycontemporaryBartky 1990
    Sandra HardingcontemporaryHarding 1987
    Sara RuddickcontemporaryRuddick 1989
    Sarah Lucia HoaglandcontemporaryHoagland 1990
    Saray AyalacontemporaryAyala and Vasilyeva 2015
    Shannon DeacontemporaryDea 2016a
    Shari Stone-MediatorecontemporaryStone-Mediatore 2004
    Sheila DauercontemporaryDauer and Gomez 2006
    Shelley TremaincontemporaryTremain 2000
    Simone de Beauvoircontemporary
    Simone de Beauvoircontemporary
    Susan EastoncontemporaryEaston 1995
    Susan MenduscontemporaryMendus 1994
    Susan Moller OkincontemporaryOkin 2005
    Susan Moller OkincontemporaryOkin 1989
    Susan WendellcontemporaryWendell 1996
    Talia Mae BettchercontemporaryBettcher 2013; Bettcher 2014
    Victoria DavioncontemporaryDavion 1993
    Virginia HeldcontemporaryHeld 1993
    Virginia HeldcontemporaryHeld 2006
    bell hookscontemporaryhooks 1984
    bell hookscontemporaryhooks 1992
    Anna Julia CoopermodernCooper [1892] 2000
    Anna Julia CoopermodernCooper [1892] 2000
    Catherine BeechermodernTong 1993, 36 and 37
    Charlotte Perkins GilmanmodernGilman 1966; Gilman 1932
    Elizabeth Cady StantonmodernStanton [1848] 1997
    Emma GoldmanmodernFiala 2018; Goldman 2012
    Emma GoldmanmodernGoldman 2012
    Emma Goldmanmodern
    Frederick Douglassmodernquoted in Davis 2011, 51
    Harriet TaylormodernTaylor 1993; Mill and Taylor in Tong 1993
    Harriet Taylor MillmodernThe Enfranchisement of Women; Taylor 1998
    Ida B. Wells-Barnettmodern
    Ida B. Wells-Barnettmodern
    Ida B. Wells-BarnettmodernJames 1997; Sterling 1979
    John Stuart MillmodernThe Subjection of Women [1869] 1987
    John Stuart MillmodernMill [1869] 1987
    John Stuart MillmodernMill and Taylor, as cited in Tong 1993
    Mary AstellmodernAstell 1694
    Mary Church Terrellmodern
    Mary WollstonecraftmodernWollstonecraft 1792
    Sojourner TruthmodernTruth [1867] 1995
    A woman's position is deeply ambiguous, navigating a human condition defined in ...Grounding philosophical inquiry in historically contingent oppressive structures...Nozick's libertarian framework holds that individuals possess inviolable rights ...Rawls's veil of ignorance methodology deliberately abstracts from situated ident...
    +4 moreShow less
    Requiring philosophers to account for oppressive structures presupposes conteste...To philosophize about women, it is indispensable to understand the economic and ...Understanding women's situation necessitates an existential point of view, takin...Universal moral principles derived from reason apply to all rational agents rega...
    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    3 (1 for, 2 against)
    Edits
    1 edit