Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Haecceitism—the doctrine that grounds the purported count... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Global supervenience and strong individual supervenience are not equivalent concepts.

    Haecceitism—the doctrine that grounds the purported counterexamples—is itself a contentious metaphysical posit, not a neutral logical datum, making the non-equivalence claim metaphysically loaded rather than analytically secure.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Analytically secure(as opposed to requiring metaphysical claims)
    Able to be proven true or false just by analyzing the meaning of the words themselves, without needing to know anything about the real world.
    Haecceitism
    A theory of primitive identity of individuals across possible worlds.
    Metaphysical posit(as a philosophical assumption)
    A claim or assumption about what fundamentally exists or is real, often one that can't be directly proven but is proposed as true.
    Metaphysically loaded(describing a claim's dependence on deeper reality assumptions)
    Packed with assumptions about what is fundamentally real, rather than being purely logical or neutral.
    counterexamples(as evidence used to challenge the justified true belief analysis)

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Specific cases or scenarios that prove a general claim or definition wrong by showing an exception to the rule.
    non-equivalence(referring to knots that are mathematically different)
    The state of two things not being the same or not having the same properties or value.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedModality & Possibility1 linked

    Related

    Global supervenience and strong individual supervenience are not equivalent conc...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective