Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Hard incompatibilists like Derk Pereboom argue that causal determinism eliminates genuine sourcehood even across a life history of character-forming acts.
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
1.
Sourcehood could require only that actions flow from one's own integrated character and reasons, not exemption from causation.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Character-formation across a life history can constitute genuine self-creation even if each step was causally determined.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
The ability to do otherwise may be incoherent even for libertarians, making it an unfair standard for sourcehood.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Reasons Against
1 perspective
Reason against
?
1.
If all events are necessitated by prior causes beyond one's control, then nothing can originate from oneself as a true source.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
2.
Character-forming acts remain causally determined by genetics, environment, and prior mental states one didn't choose.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
3.
Genuine sourcehood requires the ability to have done otherwise in identical circumstances, which determinism logically precludes.
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Strongest counterpoint
Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.