Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Harman's inference-to-best-explanation criterion for just... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→An inductive argument from intuitions about particular cases of justified belief does not support [P1]

    Harman's inference-to-best-explanation criterion for justified belief applies asymmetrically: perceptual beliefs causally covary with facts, but intuitions about justified belief do not covary with justification-making features in the same trackable way.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Asymmetrically(describes how the challenge affects the two opposing views unequally)
    In an unbalanced way, where two things are treated differently or have different requirements.
    Causally covary(describing the relationship between perceptions and facts)
    When two things change together in a connected way, where one thing directly causes or influences the other to change.
    Harman(as a philosopher whose work is being discussed)
    Gilbert Harman is a philosopher who developed influential theories about abduction and how we form beliefs based on the best available explanation.
    Inference-to-best-explanation(a criterion (test) for deciding when a belief is justified)
    A way of figuring out what's probably true by choosing the explanation that best accounts for all the facts you observe—like deciding it rained because the ground is wet, rather than someone watered it.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Intuitions (in epistemology)(the other type of belief being discussed, contrasted with perceptual beliefs)
    Immediate, gut-level convictions you have about what seems right or true without needing to work through a logical argument.
    Justification-making features(what intuitions supposedly do not track in the same way perceptions do)
    The actual reasons or facts that would make a belief worthy of being believed—what genuinely supports it.
    Perceptual beliefs(the type of beliefs being discussed)
    Things you believe to be true based directly on what you see, hear, or sense with your five senses.
    Trackable way(describing whether intuitions reliably connect to what actually justifies beliefs)
    In a manner that can be reliably followed or measured—where you can point to a clear, consistent connection between one thing and another.
    justified belief(Coherence theory of justification)
    A belief that is part of a coherent system of beliefs

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    An inductive argument from intuitions about particular cases of justified belief...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective