Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Hegel argues that Kant's thing-in-itself is a self-contra... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The categories and principles of pure understanding yield cognition only of appearances, not things in themselves.

    Hegel argues that Kant's thing-in-itself is a self-contradictory residue: applying the category of ground to posit it already transgresses the Kantian limit.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Kant uses causal language ('ground') to explain why phenomena differ from things-in-themselves, violating his own restriction on categories.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the thing-in-itself is truly unknowable, we cannot coherently assert its existence as a distinct metaphysical entity without epistemic contradiction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Hegel's dialectical method shows that limiting reason (as Kant does) generates internal contradictions that force philosophy beyond such limits.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Kant explicitly denies that 'ground' applies to things-in-themselves; he only posits their existence as a regulative, not constitutive, principle.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Distinguishing phenomena from their ground is not self-contradictory if one maintains the distinction is structural, not a positive knowledge claim.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Hegel's dialectical resolution may itself smuggle in assumptions about reason's scope that are not obviously superior to Kant's critical restraint.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge1 linkedSkepticism1 linked

    Related

    Distinguishing phenomena from their ground is not self-contradictory if one main...Hegel's dialectical method shows that limiting reason (as Kant does) generates i...Hegel's dialectical resolution may itself smuggle in assumptions about reason's ...If the thing-in-itself is truly unknowable, we cannot coherently assert its exis...
    +3 moreShow less
    Kant explicitly denies that 'ground' applies to things-in-themselves; he only po...Kant uses causal language ('ground') to explain why phenomena differ from things...The categories and principles of pure understanding yield cognition only of appe...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit