Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Hegel argues that Kant's thing-in-itself is a self-contradictory residue: applying the category of ground to posit it already transgresses the Kantian limit.

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Kant explicitly denies that 'ground' applies to things-in-themselves; he only posits their existence as a regulative, not constitutive, principle.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Distinguishing phenomena from their ground is not self-contradictory if one maintains the distinction is structural, not a positive knowledge claim.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Hegel's dialectical resolution may itself smuggle in assumptions about reason's scope that are not obviously superior to Kant's critical restraint.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Kant uses causal language ('ground') to explain why phenomena differ from things-in-themselves, violating his own restriction on categories.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.If the thing-in-itself is truly unknowable, we cannot coherently assert its existence as a distinct metaphysical entity without epistemic contradiction.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Hegel's dialectical method shows that limiting reason (as Kant does) generates internal contradictions that force philosophy beyond such limits.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.