Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Hegel's critique of abstract universality holds that laws... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→The mechanism by which self-interest yields impartial laws requires that citizens' situations be substantially similar to one another

    Hegel's critique of abstract universality holds that laws genuinely responsive to a differentiated civil society must incorporate, not erase, structural differences among citizens.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Key Terms

    Hegel(as the main philosopher referenced in this statement)
    Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel was a German philosopher (1770-1831) who argued that reality and human thought develop through a process of contradiction and resolution, constantly evolving toward greater understanding.
    Incorporate(laws should incorporate, not erase, differences)
    To include or build something into a larger whole, rather than leaving it out.
    abstract universality(Hegel's critique of moral philosophy)
    A form of morality characterized as being without content, arising from pure inward abstraction
    civil society(Central point of dispute between Burke and the Price/Wollstonecraft position)
    For Burke: a web of countless ineffable links between individuals, shaped by custom, culture, and national character, not reducible to abstract rules or rights. For Price and Wollstonecraft: a domain amenable to simplification, explication, and rational transparency.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    differentiated(as used in logic)
    Shown to be different or distinct from something else; able to be told apart.
    structural differences(as used to describe how the two procedures differ fundamentally)
    Differences in how something is organized or put together, rather than just surface-level differences.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Social Contract1 linkedDemocracy & Governance1 linked

    Related

    The mechanism by which self-interest yields impartial laws requires that citizen...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective