Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Home/Original/inverse
    See Original
    Inverse View

    It is not the case that Hegel's claim about the identity of thinking and being could be interpreted as a version of Kant's empirical realism

    ?Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.

    Reasons For

    2 perspectives
    Reason for 1 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Hegel explicitly rejects Kant's distinction between phenomena and noumena, whereas empirical realism depends on that very distinction to limit knowledge to appearances.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.For Kant, empirical realism is paired with transcendental idealism; Hegel's identity of thinking and being abolishes the transcendental remainder that makes Kantian empirical realism coherent.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Hegel's 'being' in the Science of Logic is a pure logical category prior to any empirical intuition, not the conditioned reality Kant's empirical realism addresses.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reason for 2 of 2
    ?
    • 1.Kant's empirical realism preserves a passive receptivity in intuition that constrains conceptual activity, but Hegel's identity thesis makes no room for a sensory given that is independent of thought.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The supporting argument's identification of Hegelian 'being' with Kantian 'empirical reality' ignores that Hegel's Phenomenology treats sense-certainty as itself already conceptually mediated, dissolving any Kantian-style passive givenness.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Both Hegel and Kant characterize thinking as an activity that operates on and with concepts
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.What Hegel calls 'being' can be identified with what Kant calls 'reality', namely the empirical reality of intuited objects rather than their transcendent grounds
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42