Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Helm's 'modal constraint' critique assumes contingency re... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→Paul Helm's defense of timeless foreknowledge concedes that timeless knowledge is 'accidentally necessary' relative to any temporal vantage point, preserving the very modal constraint the timelessness solution was designed to dissolve.

    Helm's 'modal constraint' critique assumes contingency requires freedom from all logical entailment, a standard stronger than required for human agency.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Connections

    1 linked claim

    Paul Helm's defense of timeless foreknowledge concedes that timeless knowledge i...

    Related

    Paul Helm's defense of timeless foreknowledge concedes that timeless knowledge i...

    Details

    Type
    premise

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Explore a random proposition
    Start fresh with something unrelated.
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective