Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Heuristic considerations also point to the non-coincidenc... — Carmelics
    Home/Modality & Possibility
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Supports→A proof that P ≠ NP would validate the Cobham-Edmonds Thesis as a correct analysis of the pre-theoretical notion of feasibility

    Heuristic considerations also point to the non-coincidence of NP and coNP, and of PH and PSPACE

    Modality & PossibilityProof of definition segments
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.

    No one has weighed in yet. Be the first to share reasons for or against this statement.

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Modality & PossibilityProof of definition segments

    Connections

    2 topics

    Truth & Knowledge3 linked

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Browse more in Modality & Possibility
    Related propositions within the same area of thought.
    All sources support it
    1 linked

    Related

    A proof that P ≠ NP would validate existing inductive evidence for P ≠ NPA proof that P ≠ NP would validate the Cobham-Edmonds Thesis as a correct analys...Such a proof would allow us to unconditionally assert that NP-hard problems are ...

    Similar

    Therefore C and D must be identical, contradicting the hypothesis that...81%Therefore Rab and Rba would be identical, which contradicts their dist...79%Therefore A is not causally independent of B.78%Carter's argument against the claim that S and S' are identical fails77%

    Source

    AI-extracted
    SEP: computational-complexity
    View source passageHide passage
    Among these are Grover’s algorithm (Grover 1996) for searching an unsorted database (which runs in time \(O(n^{1/2})\), whereas the best possible classical algorithm is \(O(n)\)) and Shor’s algorithm (Shor 1999) for integer factorization (which runs in \(O(\log_2(n)^3)\), whereas the best known classical algorithm is \(O(2^{\log_2(\log_2(n))^{1/3})}\)). Since it can be shown that quantum models can simulate models such as the classical Turing machine, \(\textbf{BQP}\) contains \(\textbf{P}\) and

    Details

    Type
    premise
    Perspectives
    0 (0 for, 0 against)
    Edits
    1 edit

    Open for perspectives

    This idea is waiting for its first supporting or challenging perspective.

    Share the first perspective