Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Hirsch is wrong that sentence meaning is identical with s... — Carmelics
    Home/Philosophy of Language
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Hirsch is wrong that sentence meaning is identical with speaker meaning

    Philosophy of Language
    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    0 reasons for
    1 reason against

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • The argument under discussion demonstrates that sentence meaning is not identical with speaker meaning
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Topics

    Philosophy of Language

    Related

    The argument under discussion demonstrates that sentence meaning is not identica...

    Similar

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.
    The argument under discussion demonstrates that sentence meaning is no...89%
    Sentence meaning and speaker meaning do not always coincide.87%
    Sentence meaning and speaker meaning are not identical.86%
    The argument showing sentence meaning is not identical with speaker me...85%

    Source

    AI-extracted1/3 agreementValid
    SEP: beardsley-aesthetics
    View source passageHide passage
    In effect, this is another demonstration that Hirsch is wrong, that sentence meaning isn’t identical with speaker meaning. The question at issue, however, is whether speaker meaning is criterial evidence for sentence meaning. For all that the argument shows, it could well be.
    Extraction notes

    Validity: Extracted via Max plan + API grounding/validity checks

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    1 (0 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit