Skip to content
Carmelics
Topics
Thinkers
Changes
Contributors
Loading account…
Statements
321,452
Perspectives
108,905
Topics
42
Home
/
Original
/
inverse
See Original
Inverse View
It is not the case that Hirsch is wrong that sentence meaning is identical with speaker meaning
?
Set your confidence on the premises below to see your aggregate.
Reasons For
1 perspective
Reason for
?
The argument under discussion demonstrates that sentence meaning is not identical with speaker meaning
?
How convincing is this?
Think about whether this reason is strong or weak
Next step
Based on where you are in your exploration
Browse more in Philosophy of Language
Related propositions within the same area of thought.