Skip to content
Carmelics
TopicsThinkersChangesContributorsLoading account…

    Carmelics

    A reasoning platform. Break down any belief into clear reasons, explore both sides, and weigh the evidence honestly.

    Navigate

    • Topics
    • Search
    • Recent Changes
    • Contribute
    • How It Works
    • Glossary
    • Thinkers
    • Contributors
    • About
    • Statistics
    • Terms
    • Privacy

    Database

    Statements
    —
    Perspectives
    —
    Topics
    —

    Press ? for keyboard shortcuts

    LoyalLoyalJusticeJustice
    Made withinDC&Austin
    Statements
    321,452
    Perspectives
    108,905
    Topics
    42
    Hume's bundle theory holds that the self is nothing but a... — Carmelics
    Home
    HistoryEditSee Inverse

    Part of a larger discussion

    Challenges→A succession of experiences is not the same as an experience of succession.

    Hume's bundle theory holds that the self is nothing but a bundle of successive perceptions with no additional unifying subject.

    ?Rate how convincing each reason is below to see the overall strength.
    1 reason for
    1 reason against

    Reasons For

    1 perspective
    Reason for
    ?
    • 1.Introspection reveals only fleeting perceptions, emotions, and thoughts—never a permanent, unchanging subject observing them.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.Positing an immaterial unifying subject beyond perceptions violates parsimony; the bundle itself sufficiently explains continuity.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Personal identity over time correlates with causal chains of perceptions, not with an underlying metaphysical substrate.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Reasons Against

    1 perspective
    Reason against
    ?
    • 1.Bundle theory cannot explain how disparate perceptions are unified as *mine* rather than randomly scattered; unity requires a subject.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 2.The theory's claim that we observe only perceptions is itself unverifiable—we cannot introspect without presupposing a unified observer.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    • 3.Perceptions require a substrate to inhere in; treating them as free-floating contradicts basic metaphysical principles of causation.
      ?

      Think about whether this reason is strong or weak

    Sign in or register to share your perspective on this statement.

    Next step

    Based on where you are in your exploration

    Strongest counterpoint
    Explore the most compelling reason on the other side.

    Connections

    2 topics

    Consciousness & Mind1 linkedPerception1 linked

    Related

    A succession of experiences is not the same as an experience of succession.Bundle theory cannot explain how disparate perceptions are unified as *mine* rat...Introspection reveals only fleeting perceptions, emotions, and thoughts—never a ...Perceptions require a substrate to inhere in; treating them as free-floating con...
    +3 moreShow less
    Personal identity over time correlates with causal chains of perceptions, not wi...Positing an immaterial unifying subject beyond perceptions violates parsimony; t...The theory's claim that we observe only perceptions is itself unverifiable—we ca...

    Details

    Type
    claim
    Perspectives
    2 (1 for, 1 against)
    Edits
    1 edit